How Correctify fights AI slop

 

Low-quality, mass-produced content is an old problem in new clothes. You may also know it as spam, fluff or clickbait. Every time a new technology makes publishing easier, low-effort junk floods the market. This mass-produced culture was even present after the invention of the printing press by Johannes Gutenberg in the form of chapbooks, small, inexpensive booklets of dubious quality. The invention of new technologies and media channels (e.g., social media) causes demand for content to rise which forces creators to sacrifice quality for quantity, leading to an increasing amount of slop.

The term was popularized by a tweet of an anonymous account by the handle @deepfates and has since become the talk of the town. So prevalent is “digital content made with generative artificial intelligence that is perceived as lacking in effort, quality, or meaning” as Wikipedia describes it, that the renowned Merriam-Webster dictionary declared “Slop” the word of the year 2025!

AI slop seems to be such a slippery slope (pun intended) that every major platform is pushing hard against it. Spotify recently removed 75 million “spammy tracks”, Pinterest now allows users to limit the amount of GenAI content they see and LinkedIn developed a button for reporting posts as AI slop:

 

But quality (or lack of) is not the only problem. When everyone is using the same generic tools and the same basic prompts, all results end up looking the same. What experts call “algorithmic monoculture” or “creative homogenization”.

Readers may sometimes struggle to identify AI slop in text, but things like em (—) dashes and “It’s not X, it’s Y” give a clue or two. Fortunately, in graphic design you don’t have to look hard. It looks like this:

 

Why generic AI models are bad graphic designers

Graphic design artifacts like posters are essentially a synthesis of many elements, namely typography, font pairing, imagery, decorative ornaments, color theory, brand identity and spatial layout. Combining these in a way that’s both beautiful and effective at communication is what we call graphic design.

One of the main reasons that generic models still fall short of what professional designers can deliver is the data they were trained on. None of the major labs publicly describes a corpus of professionally-made, layered graphics as a core training dataset. The important word here is “layered”. To become capable at graphic design, models must not be trained on flat images but on a file format that preserves meta-information such as X/Y coordinates per element and font information. This is what lets models learn how each element looks and how it relates to the others. The problem is that these types of datasets are almost nonexistent. In other words, generic models lack essential graphic design knowledge.

Evidently, when these models are evaluated on professional graphic design tasks they show substantial weaknesses. GraphicDesignBench (GDB) is the first large-scale benchmark that evaluates capable models like GPT-5.4, Gemini-3.1-Pro and Claude Opus 4.6 against 49 tasks split across five design domains and two modes. Out of these 49 tasks, 2 were mostly solved, 25 partially solved and 22 unsolved. The headline result? “no model is ready for professional design work”.

Moreover, experts agree that graphic design is a highly iterative process. That’s why every graphic design platform that respects itself allows changing, moving, adding or deleting elements manually. This is mainly the reason why text-to-image models are not the answer. You may not be aware of it, but every time you ask for a change, the model reconstructs the whole image, so chances are it won’t be exactly the same. If you are still unconvinced, here’s a list of the shortcomings of text-to-image models:

• Struggle with long-form content
• Struggle with text other than English
• Struggle with brand-specific fonts
• Don’t reliably handle logos without distorting them
• Can’t easily incorporate stock photos
• Can’t produce high-resolution designs for print
• Even the smallest edit costs you money

 

How Correctify fights AI slop

Correctify’s fundamental premise is to enable anyone to create world-class designs fast, without the need for manual work, design knowledge or prompt skills. But how does Correctify achieve this? If capable models aren't good enough on their own, are we doomed with AI slop forever? Fortunately, the answer is no.

A domain-specific platform can make significant strides. Aside from the importance of data, the harness matters immensely. Harness is the software infrastructure around a model, and includes things like orchestration loops, tools (like web search), memory, context management, error handling and guardrails. The harness is what can turn a generic model into a powerful graphic designer.

Similar to teaching a novice the fundamentals of design, models must first be taught the essentials: how to construct a design, where to place elements, how much space to leave between them and where to place emphasis. Plus, they need lots of high-quality examples, as they can’t generate a great design if they don’t know what greatness looks like.

After the basics have been established, the right architecture is needed to bring all the different elements into a coherent result. Since everything in Correctify revolves around the user’s content, our modern block-based text editor helps our model understand the content and determine information hierarchy (e.g., identify the title and which elements need emphasis). From there, based on the user’s instructions, our model plans the layout and composition so that colors, fonts, logos, imagery and decorations are properly positioned. If the user hasn’t provided anything other than his content, the model chooses the right fonts based on the desirable aesthetic (e.g., elegant or modern), chooses colors, generates decorations such as icons, shapes and illustrations, places user-provided images or searches the web for relevant ones.

Now, all these components are combined into a design that’s aesthetically pleasing, fully editable and adheres to the user’s instructions or brand guidelines. The final step is to review spacing, alignment, overflow and readability, evaluate whether the composition actually communicates effectively and find and fix mistakes.

But Correctify has another ace up its sleeve called Blueprints, a modern adaptation of traditional design templates with the notable difference that they don’t require manual editing. Blueprints are designs created by others, whose style you can apply to your content automatically. It’s like pointing at a design you like and saying “make my content look like this”. They serve as inspiration when you don’t want to start from scratch and they take care of layout, spacing, visual direction and all the little details that often require design knowledge.

The need for a domain-specific platform like Correctify is not only evident from the quality of the design output but from all the necessary features that teams need in their everyday work, like collaboration, brand kits, print-ready design quality and online publishing.

 

Try Correctify for free. Your team will thank you.